algebraic categories without free objects
An initial object is always a free object. So in the context of algebraicsystems with a trivial object, such as groups, or modules, there is alwaysat least one free object. However, we usually dismiss this example as itdoes not lead to any useful results such as the existence of presentations
.
However, there are many ways in which a cateogry of algebraic objects canfail to include non-trivial free objects.
1 Restriction to finite sets
The restriction of a category
which naturally includes infinite
objectscan often be restricted to just the finite objects and in so doing oftenremove all non-trivial free objects.
- •
The category of finite groups
has only the trivial free object. Indeed,even the rank 1 free group
, the integers is already infinite.
- •
Similarly, finite modules of in a module category over an infinitering are never free. For examples use the rings , ,etc.
However, this is not always the case. For example, if we consider finite-modules (vector spaces) each of these are free.
2 Homomorphism restrictions
In the category of rings with 1 it is often beneficial to force all ringhomomorphisms to be unital. However, this restriction can preventthe construction of free objects.
Suppose is a free ring in the category of rings with positive characteristic. Then we ask, what is the characteristic of ?
If it is then we choose another ring of a different characteristic,a characteristic relatively prime to , and then there can be nounital homomorphism from to . So must have characteristic 0.In contrast to the above examples we have not excluded infinite objectsin this restriction. This example is even more powerful than thoseabove as it also exclude the existance of an initial object, so indeedNO free objects exist in this category.
If we return to the full category of unital rings we observeevery ring is a -algebra we can use the free associativealgebras does exist here.