proof of equivalent definitions of analytic sets for paved spaces
Let be a paved space with , let be Baire space, and let be any uncountable Polish space
. For a subset of , we show that the following statements are equivalent
.
- 1.
is -analytic (http://planetmath.org/AnalyticSet2).
- 2.
There is a closed subset of and such that
- 3.
There is a closed subset of and such that
- 4.
is the result of a Souslin scheme on .
- 5.
is the projection of a set in onto , where is the collection
of compact subsets of .
- 6.
is the projection of a set in onto , where is the collection of closed subsets of .
(1) implies (2):As is analytic, there exists a compact paved space and a set such that , where is the projection map.Write
for and .Rearranging this expression,
So, defining by
gives
Setting gives the required expression, and it only remains to show that is closed.So, let be a sequence in converging to a limit . For any then for all and large enough . Hence,
So, the collection of sets for satisfies the finite intersection property, and compactness (http://planetmath.org/PavedSpace) of the paving gives
showing that and that is indeed closed.
(2) implies (3):Supposing that satisfies the required expression, choose any bijection . Then define and by where . As is closed, it follows that will also be closed and,
as required.
(3) implies (4):Suppose that satisfies the required expression and define a Souslin scheme as follows. For any and let us set
Then, for ,
Here, if , we have used the fact that is closed to deduce that for large , there is no with and, therefore, .The result of the Souslin scheme is then
as required.
(4) implies (5):Suppose that is the result of a Souslin scheme . Let us first consider the case where is Cantor space, , which is a compact Polish space.Then, for any , let be the set of such that if for some and for all other .These are closed and, therefore, compact sets.
Given any sequence it is easily seen that is nonempty if and only if there is an such that for all .Define the set in by
The projection of onto is then
which is the result of the scheme as required.The result then generalizes to any uncountable Polish space , as all such spaces contain Cantor space (http://planetmath.org/UncountablePolishSpacesContainCantorSpace).
(5) implies (6):This is trivial, since all compact sets are closed.
(6) implies (1):This is a consequence of the result that projections of analytic sets are analytic.