properties of injective functions
Theorem 1.
Suppose are sets and , are injective functions. Then the composition is an injection.
Proof.
Suppose that for some .By definition of composition, . Since , isassumed injective, . Since is also assumed injective,. Therefore, implies, so is injective.∎
Theorem 2.
Suppose is an injection, and . Thenthe restriction is an injection.
Proof.
Suppose for some . By definitionof restriction, . Since is assumed injective this,in turn, implies that . Thus, is also injective.∎
Theorem 3.
Suppose are sets and that the functions and are such that is injective. Then isinjective.
Proof.
(direct proof)Let be such that . Then .But as is injective, this implies that , hence is also injective.∎
Proof.
(proof by contradiction)Suppose that were not injective. Then there would exist such that but . Composing with , we wouldthen have . However, since is assumedinjective, this would imply that , which contradicts a previousstatement. Hence must be injective.∎
Theorem 4.
Suppose is an injection. Then, for all , it is the case that.11In this equation, the symbols “” and“” as applied to sets denote the direct image and the inverseimage, respectively
Proof.
It follows from the definition of that , whether or not happens to be injective. Hence, all thatneed to be shown is that . Assume thecontrary. Then there would exist such that. By defintion, means , so there exists such that . Since is injective, one would have , which is impossible because is supposed to belong to but is not supposed to belong to .∎
Theorem 5.
Suppose is an injection. Then, for all ,it is the case that .
Proof.
Whether or not is injective, one has ; if belongs to both and , then will clearlybelong to both and . Hence, all that needs to be shown isthat . Let be an element of which belongs to both and . Then, there exists such that and such that . Since and is injective, , so , hence .∎