semiperfect number

Given an integer $n$ and the subsets of its proper divisors $d_{i}|n$ and $d_{i}<n$ (thus $0<i<\\tau(n)$ where $\\tau$ is the divisor function), is there at least one subset whose elements add up to $n$ ? If yes, then $n$ is a semiperfect number or pseudoperfect number.

Since the complete set of proper divisors is also technically considered a subset, then a fully perfect number is also a semiperfect number. Perhaps just as obviously, no deficient number can be semiperfect; thus all semiperfect numbers are either abundant numbers or perfect numbers.

If the abundance $a(n)$ happens to be a divisor of $n$ , then the divisor subset that excludes $a(n)$ is the obvious choice, but some semiperfect numbers are so in more than one way: 12 for example can be expressed as 1 + 2 + 3 + 6 but also as 2 + 4 + 6.

Just as a multiple of an abundant number is another abundant number, so is the multiple of a semiperfect number another semiperfect number.

The first few semiperfect numbers that are not multiples of perfect numbers are 20, 40, 80, 88. A005835 of Sloane’s OEIS lists all the semiperfect numbers less than 265 and provides a simple means of reckoning them, by counting the number of partitions of $n$ into distinct divisors and culling those that have more than 1.

All primary pseudoperfect numbers (except 2) are also semiperfect. An abundant number that is not semiperfect is a weird number.

单词	SemiperfectNumber
释义	semiperfect number Given an integer $n$ and the subsets of its proper divisors $d_{i}\|n$ and $d_{i}<n$ (thus $0<i<\\tau(n)$ where $\\tau$ is the divisor function), is there at least one subset whose elements add up to $n$ ? If yes, then $n$ is a semiperfect number or pseudoperfect number. Since the complete set of proper divisors is also technically considered a subset, then a fully perfect number is also a semiperfect number. Perhaps just as obviously, no deficient number can be semiperfect; thus all semiperfect numbers are either abundant numbers or perfect numbers. If the abundance $a(n)$ happens to be a divisor of $n$ , then the divisor subset that excludes $a(n)$ is the obvious choice, but some semiperfect numbers are so in more than one way: 12 for example can be expressed as 1 + 2 + 3 + 6 but also as 2 + 4 + 6. Just as a multiple of an abundant number is another abundant number, so is the multiple of a semiperfect number another semiperfect number. The first few semiperfect numbers that are not multiples of perfect numbers are 20, 40, 80, 88. A005835 of Sloane’s OEIS lists all the semiperfect numbers less than 265 and provides a simple means of reckoning them, by counting the number of partitions of $n$ into distinct divisors and culling those that have more than 1. All primary pseudoperfect numbers (except 2) are also semiperfect. An abundant number that is not semiperfect is a weird number.
随便看	ReferencesListForHomologicalAlgebraAlgebraicGeometryAndAlgebraicTopology references list for homological algebra, algebraic geometry and algebraic topology ReflexiveModule reflexive module ReflexiveNondegenerateSesquilinear reflexive non-degenerate sesquilinear ReflexiveRelation reflexive relation RegardingTheSetsAnFromTheTravelingHumpSequence regarding the sets A_n from the traveling hump sequence Region region RegressionModel regression model RegularAtInfinity regular at infinity RegularConditionalProbability regular conditional probability RegularCovering regular covering RegularDecagonInscribedInCircle regular decagon inscribed in circle RegularElementOfALieAlgebra regular element of a Lie algebra RegularElementsOfFiniteRing