set closed under an operation
A set is said to be closed under some map, if maps elements in to elements in , i.e., .More generally, suppose is the -fold Cartesian product. If is a map , then wealso say that is closed under the map .
The above definition has no relation with the definition of aclosed set
in topology
. Instead,one should think of and as a closedsystem.
Examples
- 1.
The set of invertible matrices is closed under matrix inversion
.This means that the inverse
of an invertible matrix is again aninvertible matrix.
- 2.
Let be the set of complex valued continuous functions
onsome topological space .Suppose are functions in . Then we define thepointwise product of and as the function .Since is continuous, we have that is closed under pointwise multiplication.
In the first example, the operation is of the type . In the latter,pointwise multiplication is a map .
The second example illustrated the somewhat odd definition of this term. When a function is defined, its domain and codomain are part of its definition, so it’s a little odd to talk about whether the function is closed or not: if you know what the function is, then you should know whether or not it is closed. So in practice, the way the term is used is this: We have a set and we have a function . We are given a subset , and asked whether is closed under . In other words, there is a natural way to make into a function , by restriction; the question is, does the result always lie in ? This would mean that yields a function , which is usually what we want.
Occasionally the word is used in a potentially confusing way. For example, left ideals in a ring are supposed to be closed under addition (which is an example of what we just discussed) and left multiplication by arbitrary ring elements. What this last condition means is that for every in the ring, the left ideal should be closed under the function .