Sperner’s lemma
Let be a triangle, and let be the set of vertices of sometriangulation of . Let be a mappingof into a three-element set, say (indicated byred/green/blue respectively in the figure), such that:
- •
any point of , if it is on the side , satisfies
- •
similarly if is on the side , then
- •
if is on the side , then
(It follows that .)Then some (triangular) simplex of , say , satisfies
We will informally sketch a proof of a stronger statement:Let (resp. ) be the number of simplexes satisfying (1) and whosevertices have the same orientation as (resp. theopposite orientation). Then (whence ).
The proof is in the style of well-known proofs of, for example, Stokes’stheorem in the plane, or Cauchy’s theorems about a holomorphic function.
Define an antisymmetric function by
Let’s define a “circuit” of size as an injective mapping of thecyclic group into such that is adjacent to for all in the group.
Any circuit has what we will call a contour integral , namely
Let us say that two vertices and are equivalent if .
There are four steps:
1) Contour integrals are added when their corresponding circuits are juxtaposed.
2) A circuit of size 3, hitting the vertices of a simplex , has contour integral
- •
0 if any two of , , are equivalent, else
- •
+3 if they are inequivalent and have the same orientation as , else
- •
-3
3) If is a circuit which travels around the perimeter of the wholetriangle , and with same orientation as , then .
4) Combining the above results, we get
where the sum contains one summand for each simplex .
Remarks: In the figure, and : there are two “red-green-blue” simplexes and one blue-green-red.
With the same hypotheses as in Sperner’s lemma, there is such a simplex which is connected (along edges of the triangulation) tothe side (resp. ,)by a set of vertices for which (resp. ,. The figure illustrates that result: one of the red-green-bluesimplexes is connected to the red-green side by a red-green “curve”,and to the other two sides likewise.
The original use of Sperner’s lemma was in a proofof Brouwer’s fixed point theorem in two dimensions.