upper set operation is a closure operator
In this entry, we shall prove the assertion made inthe main entry (http://planetmath.org/UpperSet) that is a closure operator. This will be done by checkingthat the defining properties are satisfied. To begin,recall the definition of our operation
:
Definition 1.
Let be a poset and a subset of . The upper setof is defined to be the set
Now, we verify each of the properties which is requiredof a closure operator.
Theorem 1.
Proof.
Any statement of the form “”is identically false no matter what the predicate (i.e. it isan antitautology) and the set of objects satsfying an identicallyfalse condition is empty, so .∎
Theorem 2.
Proof.
This follows from reflexivity — for every , one has, hence .∎
Theorem 3.
Proof.
By the previous result, . Hence,it only remains to show that .This follows from transitivity. In order for some tobe an element of , there must exist and such that and . By transitivity, ,so , hence as well.∎
Theorem 4.
If and are subsets of a partially ordered set, then
Proof.
On the one hand, if , then forsome . It then follows that either or . In the former case, , in the lattercase, so, either way .Hence .
On the other hand, if , then either or . In the former case, thereexists such that and . Since , we also have , hence . Likewise, in the second case, we also concludethat . Therefore, we have.∎
Theorem 5.
Theorem 6.
,