upper set operation is a closure operator
In this entry, we shall prove the assertion made inthe main entry (http://planetmath.org/UpperSet) that is a closure operator. This will be done by checkingthat the defining properties are satisfied. To begin,recall the definition of our operation
![]()
:
Definition 1.
Let be a poset and a subset of . The upper setof is defined to be the set
Now, we verify each of the properties which is requiredof a closure operator.
Theorem 1.
Proof.
Any statement of the form “”is identically false no matter what the predicate![]()
(i.e. it isan antitautology) and the set of objects satsfying an identicallyfalse condition is empty, so .∎
Theorem 2.
Proof.
This follows from reflexivity![]()
— for every , one has, hence .∎
Theorem 3.
Proof.
By the previous result, . Hence,it only remains to show that .This follows from transitivity. In order for some tobe an element of , there must exist and such that and . By transitivity, ,so , hence as well.∎
Theorem 4.
If and are subsets of a partially ordered set![]()
, then
Proof.
On the one hand, if , then forsome . It then follows that either or . In the former case, , in the lattercase, so, either way .Hence .
On the other hand, if , then either or . In the former case, thereexists such that and . Since , we also have , hence . Likewise, in the second case, we also concludethat . Therefore, we have.∎
Theorem 5.
Theorem 6.
,