conditional expectation under change of measure
Let be a given probability measureon some -algebra .Suppose a new probability measure is definedby , using some -measurablerandom variable
as the Radon-Nikodym derivative
.(Necessarily we must have almost surely, and .)
We denote with the expectation with respect to the measure ,and with the expectation with respect to the measure .
Theorem 1.
If is restricted to a sub--algebra,then the restriction has the conditional expectation as its Radon-Nikodym derivative:.
In other words,
Proof.
It is required to prove that, for all ,
But this follows at once from the law of iterated conditional expectations:
Theorem 2.
Let be any sub--algebra.For any -measurable random variable ,
That is,
Proof.
Let , and. We find:
(since ) | ||||
(since ) | ||||
Since is arbitrary, we can equate the -measurable integrands:
Observe that if almost surely,then
Theorem 3.
If is a martingale with respect to and somefiltration
,then is a martingale with respect to and ,where .
Proof.
First observe that is indeed -measurable.Then, we can apply Theorem 2,with in the statement of that theorem replaced by, replaced by , replaced by , and replaced by (),to obtain:
thus proving that is a martingale under and .∎
Sometimes the random variables in Theorem 3are written as .(This is a Radon-Nikodym derivative process;note that defined as is always a martingaleunder and .)
Under the hypothesis ,there is an alternate restatement of Theorem 3that may be more easily remembered:
Theorem 4.
Let almost surely.Then is a martingale with respect to ,if and only if is a martingale with respect to .