extension and restriction of states
\\PMlinkescapephrase
restriction
0.1 Restriction of States
Let be a -algebra (http://planetmath.org/CAlgebra) and a -subalgebra, both having the same identity element.
- Given a state of , its restriction (http://planetmath.org/RestrictionOfAFunction) to is also a state of .
Remark - Note that the requirement that the -algebras and have a (common) identity element is necessary.
For example, let be a compact space and the -algebra of continuous functions . Pick a point and consider the -subalgebra of continuous functions which vanish at . Notice that this subalgebra never has the same identity element of (the constant function that equals ). In fact, this subalgebra may not have an identity
at all.
Now the evaluation mapping at , i.e. the function
is a state of . Of course, its restriction to the subalgebra in question is the zero mapping, therefore not being a state.
0.2 Extension of States
Let be a -algebra and a -subalgebra (not necessarily unital).
Theorem 1 - Every state of admits an extension to a state of . Moreover, every pure state of admits an extension to a pure state of .
Theorem 2 - The set of extensions of a state of is a compact and convex subset of , the of endowed with the weak-* topology
.