free associative algebra
Fix a commutative unital ring and a set . Then a -algebra
![]()
issaid to be free on if there exists an injection such that for all functions where is an -algebradetermine a unique algebra homomorphism such that. This is an example of a universal mapping property forfree associative algebras and in categorical settings is often explainedwith the following commutative diagram
![]()
:
To prove that free associative algebras exist in the category![]()
of allassociative algebras we provide a couple standard constructions. Itis a standard categorical procedure to conclude any two free objectson the same set are naturally equivalent and thus each constructionbelow is equivalent
![]()
.
1 Tensor algebra
Let be a set and a commutative unital ring. Then take to beany free -module with basis , and injection .Then we may form the tensor algebra of ,
[Note, and the empty tensor we define as .]Furthermore, define the injection as the map followed by the embedding of into .
Remark 1.
To make concrete use the set of all functions , orequivalently, the direct product![]()
. Then the tensor algebraof is the free algebra
![]()
on .
Proposition 2.
is a free associative algebra on .
Proof.
Given any associative -algebra and function , then is a -module and is free on so extends to a unique-linear homomorphism![]()
.
Next we define -multilinear maps by
Then by the universal mapping property of tensor products (used inductively)we have a unique -linear map for which
Thus we have a unique algebra homomorphism such that .∎
This construction provides an obvious grading on the free algebra wherethe homogeneous components are
2 Non-commutative polynomials
An alternative construction is to model the methods of constructing freegroups![]()
and semi-groups, that is, to use words on the set . We willdenote the result of this construction by and we willfind many parallels to polynomial algebras with indeterminants in .
Let be the set of all words on . This makes a free monoid with identity the empty word andassociative product
![]()
the juxtaposition of words. Then define as the -semi-group algebra on .This means is the free -modules oN and the product is defined as:
For example, contains elements of the form
This model of a free associative algebra encourages a mapping to polynomialrings![]()
. Indeed, is uniquely determined bythe free property applied to the natural inclusion of into .What we realize this mapping in a practical fashion we note that this simplyallows all indeterminants to commute. It follows from this that isa free commutative associaitve algebra.
For example, under this map we translate![]()
the above elements into:
We also note that the grading detected in the tensor algebra constructionpersists in the non-commuting polynomial model. In particular, we say anelement in is homogeneous if it contained in. Then the degree of a homogeneous element
is thelength of the word. Then the -linear span of elements of degree form the -th graded component
![]()
of .
Remark 3.
We note that the free properties of both of these constructions dependin turn on the free properties of modules, the universal property oftensors and free semi-groups. An inspection of the common constructionof tensors and free modules![]()
reveals both of these have universal propertiesimplied from the universal mapping property of free semi-groups. Thuswe may assert that free of associative algebras are a direct result ofthe existence of free semi-groups.
For non-associative algebras such as Lie and Jordan algebras![]()
, theuniversal properties are more subtle.