| 释义 | 
		Cubic EquationA cubic equation is a Polynomial equation of degree three.  Given a general cubic equation
    | (1) |  
   (the Coefficient   of   may be taken as 1 without loss of generality by dividing the entire equation through by ), first attempt to eliminate the   term by making a substitution of the form
   | (2) |  
  ThenThe   is eliminated by letting  , so
   | (6) |  
  Then
  so equation (1) becomes
 
   | (10) |  
 
   | (11) |  
 
   | (12) |  
  Defining
  then allows (12) to be written in the standard form
   | (15) |  
  The simplest way to proceed is to make Vieta's Substitution
   | (16) |  
  which reduces the cubic to the equation
   | (17) |  
  which is easily turned into a Quadratic Equation in   by multiplying through by   to obtain
   | (18) |  
  (Birkhoff and Mac Lane 1965, p. 106).  The result from the Quadratic Equation is
  where   and   are sometimes more useful to deal with than are   and  . There are therefore six solutions for  (two corresponding to each sign for each Root of  ).  Plugging   back in to (17) gives three pairs ofsolutions, but each pair is equal, so there are three solutions to the cubic equation.
 
 Equation (12) may also be explicitly factored by attempting to pull out a term of the form   from the cubicequation, leaving behind a quadratic equation which can then be factored using the Quadratic Formula.  This processis equivalent to making Vieta's substitution, but does a slightly better job of motivating Vieta's ``magic''substitution, and also at producing the explicit formulas for the solutions.  First, define the intermediate variables
   (which are identical to   and   up to a constant factor).  The general cubic equation (12) then becomes
   | (22) |  
  Let   and   be, for the moment, arbitrary constants.  An identity satisfied by Perfect Cubicequations is that
   | (23) |  
  The general cubic would therefore be directly factorable if it did not have an   term (i.e., if  ).  However, sincein general  , add a multiple of  --say  --to both sides of (23) to give the slightly messyidentity
   | (24) |  
  which, after regrouping terms, is
   | (25) |  
  We would now like to match the Coefficients   and   with those of equation (22), so we must have
   | (26) |  
 
   | (27) |  
  Plugging the former into the latter then gives
   | (28) |  
  Therefore, if we can find a value of   satisfying the above identity, we have factored a linear term from the cubic,thus reducing it to a Quadratic Equation.  The trial solution accomplishing this miracle turns out to be the symmetrical expression
   | (29) |  
  Taking the second and third Powers of   gives
  Plugging   and   into the left side of (28) gives
   | (32) |  
  so we have indeed found the factor   of (22), and we need now only factor the quadratic part.  Plugging  into the quadratic part of (25) and solving the resulting
   | (33) |  
  then gives the solutions
  These can be simplified by defining
 
  so that the solutions to the quadratic part can be written
   | (37) |  
  Defining
  where   is the Discriminant (which is defined slightly differently, includingthe opposite Sign, by Birkhoff and Mac Lane 1965) then gives very simple expressions for   and  , namely
  Therefore, at last, the Roots of the original equation in   are then given by
  with   the Coefficient of   in the original equation, and   and   as defined above.  These three equationsgiving the three Roots of the cubic equation are sometimes known as Cardano's Formula.  Note that if the equationis in the standard form of Vieta
   | (46) |  
  in the variable  , then  ,  , and  , and the intermediate variables have the simple form (c.f. Beyer 1987)
 
 
 
 The equation for   in Cardano's Formula does not have an   appearing in it explicitly while   and   do,but this does not say anything about the number of Real and Complex Roots(since   and   are themselves, in general, Complex).  However, determining whichRoots are Real and which are Complex can be accomplished bynoting that if the Discriminant  , one Root is Realand two are Complex Conjugates; if  , all Roots are Real and at least two are equal; and if  , all Roots are Real and unequal. If , define
    | (50) |  
  Then the Real solutions are of the form
  This procedure can be generalized to find the Real Roots for any equation in the standard form(46) by using the identity
   | (54) |  
  (Dickson 1914) and setting
   | (55) |  
  (Birkhoff and Mac Lane 1965, pp. 90-91), then
   | (56) |  
 
   | (57) |  
 
   | (58) |  
  If  , then use
   | (59) |  
  to obtain
   | (60) |  
  If   and  , use
   | (61) |  
  and if   and  , use
   | (62) |  
  to obtain
   | (63) |  
  The solutions to the original equation are then
   | (64) |  
 
 
 An alternate approach to solving the cubic equation is to use Lagrange Resolvents.  Let  , define
   where   are the Roots of
   | (68) |  
  and consider the equation
   | (69) |  
  where   and   are Complex Numbers.  TheRoots are then
   | (70) |  
  for  , 1, 2.  Multiplying through gives
   | (71) |  
  or
   | (72) |  
  where
 
 
 
 The solutions satisfy Newton's Identities
   In standard form,  ,  , and  , so we have the identities
 
 Some curious identities involving the roots of a cubic equation due to Ramanujan   are given by Berndt (1994). See also Quadratic Equation, Quartic Equation, Quintic Equation, Sextic Equation References
 Abramowitz, M. and Stegun, C. A. (Eds.).  Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables, 9th printing.  New York: Dover, p. 17, 1972.Berger, M.  §16.4.1-16.4.11.1 in Geometry I.  New York: Springer-Verlag, 1994. Berndt, B. C.  Ramanujan's Notebooks, Part IV.  New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 22-23, 1994. Beyer, W. H.  CRC Standard Mathematical Tables, 28th ed.  Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 9-11, 1987. Birkhoff, G. and Mac Lane, S.  A Survey of Modern Algebra, 3rd ed.  New York: Macmillan, pp. 90-91,  106-107, and 414-417, 1965. Dickson, L. E.  ``A New Solution of the Cubic Equation.''  Amer. Math. Monthly 5, 38-39, 1898. Dickson, L. E.  Elementary Theory of Equations.  New York: Wiley, pp. 36-37, 1914. Dunham, W.  ``Cardano and the Solution of the Cubic.''  Ch. 6 in   Journey Through Genius: The Great Theorems of Mathematics.  New York: Wiley, pp. 133-154, 1990. Ehrlich, G.  §4.16 in Fundamental Concepts of Abstract Algebra.  Boston, MA: PWS-Kent, 1991. Jones, J.  ``Omar Khayyám and a Geometric Solution of the Cubic.''    http://jwilson.coe.uga.edu/emt669/Student.Folders/Jones.June/omar/omarpaper.html. Kennedy, E. C.  ``A Note on the Roots of a Cubic.''  Amer. Math. Monthly 40, 411-412, 1933. King, R. B.  Beyond the Quartic Equation.  Boston, MA: Birkhäuser, 1996. Press, W. H.; Flannery, B. P.; Teukolsky, S. A.; and Vetterling, W. T.  ``Quadratic and Cubic Equations.''  §5.6 in  Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN: The Art of Scientific Computing, 2nd ed.  Cambridge, England:  Cambridge University Press, pp. 178-180, 1992. Spanier, J. and Oldham, K. B.  ``The Cubic Function   and Higher Polynomials.''  Ch. 17 in An Atlas of Functions.  Washington, DC: Hemisphere, pp. 131-147, 1987. van der Waerden, B. L.  §64 in Algebra.  New York: Frederick Ungar, 1970.   |