polarities and forms
Through out this article we assume . This is not a true constraint as there are only trivial dualities for .
Proposition 1.
Every duality gives rise to a non-degenerate sesquilinear form,and visa-versa.
Proof.
To see this, let be a duality. We may express this as an order preserving map . Then by the fundamental theorem of projective geometry![]()
it follows is induced by a bijective
![]()
semi-linear transformation .
An semi-linear isomorphism![]()
of to is equivalent
![]()
to specifying a non-degenerate sesquilinear form. In particular, define the form by (notice so ).
Now, if is a non-degenerate sesquilinear form. Thendefine
which is semi-linear, as is sesquilinear, and bijective, since isnon-degenerate. Therefore induces an order preserving bijection , that is, a duality.∎
We write for the image of the induced duality of a non-degeneratesesquilinear form . Notice that . (Although the form may not be reflexive![]()
, we still use the notation, but we now demonstrate that we can indeed specialize to the reflexive case.)Notice then that
Corollary 2.
Every polarity![]()
gives rise to a reflexive non-degenerate sesquilinear form,and visa-versa.
Proof.
Let be the sesquilinear form induced by the polarity . Then suppose wehave such that . So. But has order 2 so . But this implies so is reflexive.
Likewise, given a reflexive non-degenerate sesquilinear form it gives risedo a duality induced by . By the reflexivity, implies also. As it follows . But bydimension arguments:
we conclude . Thus is a polarity.∎
From the fundamental theorem of projective geometry it follows if then every order preserving map is induced by a semi-linear transformation of . In similar![]()
fashion we have
Proposition 3.
, meaning that every orderreversing map can be decomposed as a where is induced from a semi-linear transformation and is a polarity.
Proof.
Let be any duality of . Then is order preserving. Thus is a projectivity![]()
so by the fundamental theorem of projective geometry is induced by a semi-linear transformation . Therefore has index 2 in . Finally it suffices toprovide any polarity of to prove .For this use any reflexive non-degenerate sesquilinear form.∎
Remark 4.
The group is the automorphism group![]()
of .In particular, the polarities account for the graph automorphisms
![]()
of theDynkin diagram of , . When there is nograph automorphism, just as there are no dualities (points are hyperplanes
![]()
when .)
References
- 1 Gruenberg, K. W. and Weir, A.J.Linear Geometry

2nd Ed. (English)[B] Graduate Texts in Mathematics. 49. New York - Heidelberg - Berlin: Springer-Verlag. X, 198 p. DM 29.10; $ 12.80 (1977).
- 2 Kantor, W. M.Lectures notes on Classical Groups.