is irrational for (proof using Fermat’s last theorem)
Theorem 1.
If , then is irrational.
The below proof can be seen as an example of a pathological proof.It gives no information to “why” the result holds, orhow non-trivial the result is.Yet, assuming Wiles’ proof does not use the above theorem anywhere,it proves the statement. Otherwise, the below proof would be anexample of a circular argument.
Proof.
Suppose for some positive integers . It follows that, or
(1) |
We can now apply a recent result of Andrew Wiles [1],which states that there are no non-zero integers , satisfying equation (1).Thus is irrational.∎
The above proof is given in [2], where it is attributed to W.H. Schultz.
References
- 1 A. Wiles, Modular elliptic curves and Fermat’s last theorem,Annals of Mathematics, Volume 141, No. 3 May, 1995, 443-551.
- 2 W.H. Schultz, An observation,American Mathematical Monthly, Vol. 110, Nr. 5, May 2003.(submitted by R. Ehrenborg).