quantum groups
0.1 Introduction
Definition 0.1.
A quantum group is often defined as the dual of a Hopf algebra
or coalgebra. Actually, quantum groups are constructed by employing certain Hopf algebras as “building blocks”, and in the case of finite groups
they are obtained from the latter by Fourier transformation
of the group elements.
Let us consider next, alternative definitions of quantum groups that indeed possess extended quantum symmetries and algebraic properties distinct from those of Hopf algebras.
0.2 Quantum Groups, Quantum Operator Algebras and Related Symmetries
Definition 0.2.
Quantum groups are defined as locally compact topological groups endowed with a left Haar measure system, and also with at least one internal quantum symmetry, such as the intrinsic spin symmetry represented by either Pauli matrices or the Dirac algebra of observable spin operators.
For additional examples of quantum groups the reader is referred to the last six publications listed in the bibliography.
Remark 0.1.
One can also consider quantum groups as a particular case of quantum groupoids in the limitingcase where there is only one symmetry
type present in the quantum groupoid.
0.3 Quantum Groups, Paragroups and Operator Algebras in Quantum Theories
Quantum theories adopted a new lease of life post 1955 when von Neumann beautifully re-formulated Quantum Mechanics (QM) in the mathematically rigorous context of Hilbert spaces
and operator algebras. From a current physics perspective, von Neumann’s approach to quantum mechanics has done however much more: it has not only paved the way to expanding the role of symmetry inphysics, as for example with the Wigner-Eckhart theorem and itsapplications, but also revealed the fundamental importance inquantum physics of the state space
geometry of (quantum) operatoralgebras. Subsequent developments of the quantum operator algebra
were aimed at identifying more general quantum symmetries than those defined for example by symmetry groups, groups of unitary operators and Lie groups
. Several fruitful quantum algebraic concepts were developed, such as: the Ocneanu paragroups-later found to be represented by Kac–Moody algebras
, quantum ‘groups’ represented either as Hopf algebras or locally compact groups with Haar measure, ‘quantum’ groupoids
represented as weak Hopf algebras, and so on. The Ocneanu paragroups case is particularly interesting as it can be considered as an extension
through quantization of certain finite group symmetries to infinitely-dimensional von Neumann type factors (subalgebras
), and are, in effect, ‘quantized groups’ that can be nicely constructed as Kac algebras; in fact, it was recently shown that a paragroup can be constructed from a crossed product by an outer action of a Kac algebra. This suggests a relation
to categorical aspects of paragroups (rigid monoidal tensor categories previously reported in the literature). The strict symmetry of the group of (quantum) unitary operators is thus naturally extended through paragroups to the symmetry of the latter structure
’s unitary representations
; furthermore, if a subfactor of the von Neumann algebra
arises as a crossed product by a finite group action, the paragroup for this subfactor contains a very similar
group structure to that of the original finite group, and also has a unitary representation theory similar to that of the original finite group. Last-but-not least, a paragroup yields a complete
invariant
for irreducible
inclusions of AFD von Neumannn type factors with finite index and finite depth (Theorem 2.6. of Sato, 2001). This can be considered as a kind of internal, ‘hidden’ quantum symmetry of von Neumann algebras.
On the other hand, unlike paragroups, (quantum) locally compact groups are not readily constructed as either Kac or Hopf C*-algebras. In recent years the techniques of Hopf symmetry and those of weak Hopf C*-algebras, sometimes called quantum groupoids (cf Böhm et al.,1999),provide important tools–in addition to the paragroups– for studying the broader relationships of the Wigner fusion rules algebra, –symmetry (Rehren, 1997), as well as the study of the noncommutativesymmetries of subfactors within the Jones tower constructed from finite index depth 2 inclusion of factors, also recently considered from the viewpoint of related Galois correspondences (Nikshych and Vainerman, 2000).
Remark 0.2.
Compact quantum groups (CQGs) (http://planetmath.org/CompactQuantumGroup) are of great interest in physical mathematicsespecially in relation to locally compact quantum groups (L-CQGs) (http://planetmath.org/LocallyCompactQuantumGroup).
References
- 1 M. Chaician and A. Demichev: Introduction to Quantum Groups, World Scientific (1996).
- 2 V. G. Drinfel’d: Quantum groups, In Proc. Intl. Congress ofMathematicians, Berkeley 1986, (ed. A. Gleason), Berkeley, 798-820 (1987).
- 3 P.. I. Etingof and A. N. Varchenko, Solutions of the Quantum Dynamical Yang-Baxter Equation and Dynamical Quantum Groups, Comm.Math.Phys., 196: 591-640 (1998).
- 4 P. I. Etingof and A. N. Varchenko: Exchange dynamical quantum groups, Commun. Math. Phys. 205 (1): 19-52 (1999)
- 5 P. I. Etingof and O. Schiffmann: Lectures on the dynamical Yang–Baxter equations, in Quantum Groups and Lie Theory (Durham, 1999), pp. 89-129, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001.
- 6 J. M. G. Fell.: The Dual Spaces
of C*–Algebras., Transactions of the AmericanMathematical Society, 94: 365–403 (1960).
- 7 P. Hahn: Haar measure for measure groupoids., Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 242: 1–33(1978).
- 8 P. Hahn: The regular representations
of measure groupoids., Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 242:34–72(1978).
- 9 C. Heunen, N. P. Landsman, B. Spitters.: A topos for algebraic quantum theory, (2008)
arXiv:0709.4364v2 [quant–ph] - 10 S. Majid. Quantum groups, http://www.ams.org/notices/200601/what-is.pdfon line