bounds on
This article shows that
and thus that the function
is bounded above and below.
Definition 1
If is an integer, write where the are distinct primes. Then
Lemma 1
Proof.Note that the number of multiples of is simply . But that does not result in since some of those numbers may have additional factors of . So divide each by ; then clearly
The result follows inductively. Note that the sum is actually finite.
Lemma 2
If , all distinct, then .
Proof.Consider . Choose such that ; it suffices to show .
Now, in general, if , then or . So the sum above has at most terms (since ), each of which is either or , and thus .
Theorem 1
(Chebyshev) If
Proof.Choose such that , and write . Each by the preceding lemma, and there are at most terms on the right-hand side. Thus
Summing from to , we get
But since , so
so and thus
Theorem 2
(Chebyshev)
Proof.Note that if is prime, , then divides since occurs in the numerator but not in the denominator. Thus divides as well, and thus
and therefore
Taking logs, we get
Let . Then
Then
Note that is monotonically increasing, so if we choose with , then