ultrametric triangle inequality
Theorem 1.
Let be a field and an ordered group equipped with zero. Suppose that the function satisfies the postulates 1 and 2 of Krull valuation. Then the non-archimedean or ultrametric triangle inequality
3.
in the field is with the condition
(*)
Proof. The value in the ultrametric triangle inequality gives the (*) as result. Secondly, let’s assume the condition (*). Let and be non-zero elements of the field (if then 3 is at once verified), and let e.g. . Then we get , and thus according to (*),
So we see that .
Theorem 2.
The Krull valuation (and any non-archimedean valuation (http://planetmath.org/Valuation)) of the field satisfies the sharpening
of the ultrametric triangle inequality.
Proof. Let e.g. . Surely , but also ; this maximum is since otherwise one would have . Thus the result is: .
Note. The metric defined by a non-archimedean valuation of the field is the ultrametric of . Theorem 2 implies, that every triangle of with vertices , , () is isosceles: if , then .
Theorem 3.
The valuation (http://planetmath.org/Valuation) of the field is archimedean if and only if the set
of the “values” of the multiples of the unity is not bounded
.
Proof. If is non-archimedean, then , and the multiples are bounded. Conversely, let . Now one obtains, when :
or for all . As tends to infinity, this root has the limit 1. Therefore one gets the limit inequality , i.e. the valuation is non-archimedean.
References
- 1 Emil Artin: Theory of Algebraic Numbers
. Lecture notes. Mathematisches Institut, Göttingen (1959).