consequence operator determined by a class of subsets
Theorem 1.
Let be a set and let be a subset of . The the mapping defined as is a consequence operator.
Proof.
We need to check that satisfies the defining properties.
Property 1:Since every element of the set contains , we have .
Property 2:For every element of such that , it also is the case that because an intersection of a family of sets is a subset ofany member of the family. In other words (or rather, symbols),
hence . By the first property proven above, so . Thus, .
Property 3:Let and be two subsets of such that . Then if,for some other subset of , we have , it follows that. Hence,
so .
∎