existence of maximal ideals

Theorem.

Let $\mathrm{R}$ be a unital ring.Every proper ideal of $\mathrm{R}$ lies in a maximal ideal of $\mathrm{R}$.

Applying this theorem to the zero ideal gives the following corollary:

Corollary.

Every unital ring $\mathrm{R}\mathrm{\ne }\mathrm{0}$ has a maximal ideal.

Proof of theorem.This proof is a straightforward application of Zorn’s Lemma.Readers are encouraged to attempt the proof themselvesbefore reading the details below.

Let $ℐ$ be a proper ideal of $ℛ$,and let $\mathrm{\Sigma }$ be the partially ordered set

$$\mathrm{\Sigma }=\{𝒜\mid 𝒜\text{ is an ideal of }ℛ,\text{ and }ℐ\subseteq 𝒜\ne ℛ\}$$

ordered by inclusion.

Note that $ℐ\in \mathrm{\Sigma }$, so $\mathrm{\Sigma }$ is non-empty.

In order to apply Zorn’s Lemmawe need to prove that every non-empty chain (http://planetmath.org/TotalOrder)in $\mathrm{\Sigma }$ has an upper bound in $\mathrm{\Sigma }$.Let $\{{𝒜}_{\alpha }\}$ be a non-empty chain of ideals in $\mathrm{\Sigma }$,so for all indices $\alpha ,\beta$ we have

$${𝒜}_{\alpha }\subseteq {𝒜}_{\beta }\mathit{\hspace{1em}}\text{ or }\mathit{\hspace{1em}}{𝒜}_{\beta }\subseteq {𝒜}_{\alpha }.$$

We claim that $ℬ$ defined by

$$ℬ=\bigcup _{\alpha }{𝒜}_{\alpha }$$

is a suitable upper bound.

• $ℬ$ is an ideal. Indeed, let $a,b\in ℬ$,so there exist $\alpha ,\beta$ such that $a\in {𝒜}_{\alpha }$, $b\in {𝒜}_{\beta }$. Since these twoideals are in a totally ordered chain we have

  $${𝒜}_{\alpha }\subseteq {𝒜}_{\beta }\mathit{\hspace{1em}}\text{ or }\mathit{\hspace{1em}}{𝒜}_{\beta }\subseteq {𝒜}_{\alpha }$$

  Without loss of generality, we assume${𝒜}_{\alpha }\subseteq {𝒜}_{\beta }$. Then both$a,b\in {𝒜}_{\beta }$, and ${𝒜}_{\beta }$ is anideal of the ring $ℛ$. Thus $a+b\in {𝒜}_{\beta }\subseteq ℬ$.

  Similarly, let $r\in ℛ$ and $b\in ℬ$. Asabove, there exists $\beta$ such that $b\in {𝒜}_{\beta }$.Since ${𝒜}_{\beta }$ is an ideal we have

  $$r\cdot b\in {𝒜}_{\beta }\subseteq ℬ$$

  and

  $$b\cdot r\in {𝒜}_{\beta }\subseteq ℬ.$$

  Therefore, $ℬ$ is an ideal.

• $ℬ\ne ℛ$, otherwise $1$ would belong to$ℬ$, so there would be an $\alpha$ such that $1\in {𝒜}_{\alpha }$ so ${𝒜}_{\alpha }=ℛ$. Butthis is impossible because we assumed ${𝒜}_{\alpha }\in \mathrm{\Sigma }$ for all indices $\alpha$.

• $ℐ\subseteq ℬ$.Indeed, the chain is non-empty,so there is some ${𝒜}_{\alpha }$ in the chain,and we have $ℐ\subseteq {𝒜}_{\alpha }\subseteq ℬ$.

Therefore $ℬ\in \mathrm{\Sigma }$. Hence every chain in $\mathrm{\Sigma }$has an upper bound in $\mathrm{\Sigma }$ and we can apply Zorn’s Lemma todeduce the existence of $ℳ$, a maximal element (withrespect to inclusion) in $\mathrm{\Sigma }$.By definition of the set $\mathrm{\Sigma }$,this $ℳ$ must be a maximal ideal of $ℛ$containing $ℐ$. QED

Note that the above proof never makes use ofthe associativity of ring multiplication,and the result therefore holds also in non-associative rings.The result cannot, however, be generalized to rings without unity.

Note also that the use of the Axiom of Choice (in the form of Zorn’s Lemma)is necessary,as there are models of ZF in which the above theorem and corollary fail.

Title	existence of maximal ideals
Canonical name	ExistenceOfMaximalIdeals
Date of creation	2013-03-22 13:56:57
Last modified on	2013-03-22 13:56:57
Owner	yark (2760)
Last modified by	yark (2760)
Numerical id	22
Author	yark (2760)
Entry type	Theorem
Classification	msc 16D25
Classification	msc 13A15
Synonym	existence of maximal ideals
Related topic	ZornsLemma
Related topic	AxiomOfChoice
Related topic	MaximalIdeal
Related topic	ExistenceOfMaximalSubgroups
Related topic	DefinitionOfPrimeIdealByKrull