释义 |
Ordinary Differential Equation Second-OrderAn ODE
 | (1) |
has singularities for finite under the following conditions: (a) If either or diverges as , but and remain finite as , then is called a regular or nonessentialsingular point. (b) If diverges faster than so that as , or diverges faster than so that as , then is called anirregular or essential singularity.
Singularities of equation (1) at infinity are investigated by making the substitution , so , giving
 | (2) |
Then (1) becomes
 | (4) |
Case (a): If
remain finite at ( ), then the point is ordinary. Case (b): If either diverges no morerapidly than or diverges no more rapidly than , then the point is a regular singular point. Case (c): Otherwise, the point is an irregular singular point.
Morse and Feshbach (1953, pp. 667-674) give the canonical forms and solutions for second-order ODEs classified bytypes of singular points.
For special classes of second-order linear ordinary differential equations, variable Coefficients canbe transformed into constant Coefficients. Given a second-order linear ODE with variableCoefficients
 | (7) |
Define a function ,
 | (8) |
 | (9) |
 | (10) |
 | (11) |
This will have constant Coefficients if and are not functions of . But we are free to set to an arbitrary Positive constant for by defining as
 | (12) |
Then
 | (13) |
 | (14) |
and
Equation (11) therefore becomes
 | (16) |
which has constant Coefficients provided that
 | (17) |
Eliminating constants, this gives
 | (18) |
So for an ordinary differential equation in which is a constant, the solution is given by solving the second-orderlinear ODE with constant Coefficients
 | (19) |
for , where is defined as above.
A linear second-order homogeneous differential equation of the general form
 | (20) |
can be transformed into standard form
 | (21) |
with the first-order term eliminated using the substitution
 | (22) |
Then
 | (23) |
 | (24) |
 | (25) |
so
Therefore,
 | (28) |
where
 | (29) |
If , then the differential equation becomes
 | (30) |
which can be solved by multiplying by
 | (31) |
to obtain
 | (32) |
 | (33) |
 | (34) |
If one solution ( ) to a second-order ODE is known, the other ( ) may be found using the Reduction ofOrder method. From the Abel's Identity
 | (35) |
where
 | (36) |
 | (37) |
 | (38) |
 | (39) |
But
 | (40) |
Combining (39) and (40) yields
 | (41) |
 | (42) |
Disregarding , since it is simply a multiplicative constant, and the constants and , which will contribute asolution which is not linearly independent of ,
 | (43) |
If , this simplifies to
 | (44) |
For a nonhomogeneous second-order ODE in which the term does not appear in the function ,
 | (45) |
let , then
 | (46) |
So the first-order ODE
 | (47) |
if linear, can be solved for as a linear first-order ODE. Once the solution is known,
 | (48) |
 | (49) |
On the other hand, if is missing from ,
 | (50) |
let , then , and the equation reduces to
 | (51) |
which, if linear, can be solved for as a linear first-order ODE. Once the solution is known,
 | (52) |
See also Abel's Identity, Adjoint Operator References
Arfken, G. ``A Second Solution.'' §8.6 in Mathematical Methods for Physicists, 3rd ed. Orlando, FL: Academic Press, pp. 467-480, 1985.Boyce, W. E. and DiPrima, R. C. Elementary Differential Equations and Boundary Value Problems, 4th ed. New York: Wiley, 1986. Morse, P. M. and Feshbach, H. Methods of Theoretical Physics, Part I. New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 667-674, 1953.
|