localization for distributions
DefinitionSuppose is an open set in and is adistribution . Then we say that vanishes onan open set , if the restriction of to isthe zero distribution on . In other words, vanishes on , if for all . (Here is the setof smooth function with compact support in .) Similarly, we say thattwo distributions are equal, orcoincide on , if vanishes on . We thenwrite: on .
Theorem[1, 3]Suppose is an open set in and is an open cover of , i.e.,
Here, is an arbitrary index set. If are distributions on ,such that on each , then (on U).
Proof. Suppose . Our aim is to show that .First, we have for some compact .It follows (http://planetmath.org/YIsCompactIfAndOnlyIfEveryOpenCoverOfYHasAFiniteSubcover) that there exist a finite collection
of :s from the open cover,say , such that .By a smooth partition of unity, thereare smooth functions
such that
- 1.
for all .
- 2.
for all and all ,
- 3.
for all .
From the first property, and from a property for the support of a function (http://planetmath.org/SupportOfFunction),it follows that.Therefore, for each , since and conicideon .Then
and the theorem follows.
References
- 1 G.B. Folland, Real Analysis: Modern Techniques and Their Applications, 2nd ed, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1999.
- 2 W. Rudin, Functional Analysis
,McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1973.
- 3 L. Hörmander, The Analysis
of Linear Partial Differential Operators I,(Distribution theory and Fourier Analysis), 2nd ed, Springer-Verlag, 1990.