Fréchet space
We consider two classes of topological vector spaces![]()
, one more generalthan the other. Following Rudin [1] we will define a Fréchet spaceto be an element of the smaller class, and refer to an instance of themore general class as an F-space. After giving thedefinitions, we will explain why one definition is stronger than theother.
Definition 1.
An F-space is a complete topological vector space whose topology![]()
isinduced by a translation
![]()
invariant metric. To be more precise, we saythat is an F-space if there exists a metric function
such that
and such that the collection![]()
of balls
is a base for the topology of .
Note 1.
Recall that a topological vector space is a uniform space.The hypothesis![]()
that is complete
is formulated in reference to thisuniform structure. To be more precise, we say that a sequence is Cauchy if for every neighborhood of theorigin there exists an such that for all . The completeness condition then takesthe usual form of the hypothesis that all Cauchy sequences
possess alimit point
![]()
.
Note 2.
It is customary to include the hypothesis that isHausdorff in the definition of a topological vector space.Consequently, a Cauchy sequence in a complete topological spacewill have a unique limit.
Note 3.
Since is assumed to be complete, the pair is a complete metric space. Thus, an equivalent![]()
definition ofan F-space is that of a vector space
![]()
equipped with a complete, translation-invariant (but not necessarily homogeneous
(http://planetmath.org/NormedVectorSpace)) metric, such that the operations
![]()
of scalarmultiplication and vector addition are continuous
![]()
with respect to thismetric.
Definition 2.
A Fréchet space is a complete topological vector space (either realor complex) whose topology is induced by a countable![]()
family ofsemi-norms. To be more precise, there exist semi-norm functions
such that the collection of all balls
is a base for the topology of .
Proposition 1
Let be a complete topological vector space. Then, is aFréchet space if and only if it is a locally convex F-space.
Proof.First, let us show that a Fréchet space is a locally convex F-space,and then prove the converse![]()
. Suppose then that is Fréchet. Thesemi-norm balls are convex; this follows directly from the semi-normaxioms. Therefore is locally convex. To obtain the desireddistance function we set
| (1) |
We now show that satisfies the metric axioms. Let such that be given. Since is Hausdorff, there is atleast one seminorm such
Hence .
Let be three real numbers such that
A straightforward calculation showsthat
| (2) |
as well. The above trick underlies the definition (1) ofour metric function. By the seminorm axioms we have that
for all . Combining this with (1) and(2) yields the triangle inequality![]()
![]()
for .
Next let us suppose that is a locally convex F-space, and provethat it is Fréchet. For every let be an openconvex neighborhood of the origin, contained inside a ball of radius about the origin. Let be the seminorm with as the unit ball. By definition, the unit balls of theseseminorms give a neighborhood base for the topology of . QED.
References
- 1 W.Rudin, Functional Analysis

.